<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>blog on jonah vairon</title>
    <link>https://58e1b19d.site-bk0.pages.dev/tags/blog/</link>
    <description>Recent content in blog on jonah vairon</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-uk</language>
    <copyright>© 2025 Jonah Vairon</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://58e1b19d.site-bk0.pages.dev/tags/blog/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>the best fibonacci implementation?</title>
      <link>https://58e1b19d.site-bk0.pages.dev/writing/the-best-fibonacci-implementation/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://58e1b19d.site-bk0.pages.dev/writing/the-best-fibonacci-implementation/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been meaning to write about this ever since I came across it in Abelson &amp;amp;&#xA;Sussman&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href=&#34;https://mitp-content-server.mit.edu/books/content/sectbyfn/books_pres_0/6515/sicp.zip/index.html&#34;&gt;wizard book&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I mean, Fibonacci is &lt;strong&gt;the&lt;/strong&gt; classic example of a recursive function. And it&amp;rsquo;s often&#xA;just implemented as:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;div class=&#34;highlight&#34;&gt;&lt;pre tabindex=&#34;0&#34; style=&#34;color:#c8d3f5;background-color:#222436;-moz-tab-size:4;-o-tab-size:4;tab-size:4;&#34;&gt;&lt;code class=&#34;language-python&#34; data-lang=&#34;python&#34;&gt;&lt;span style=&#34;display:flex;&#34;&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style=&#34;color:#c099ff&#34;&gt;def&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style=&#34;color:#82aaff&#34;&gt;fib&lt;/span&gt;(n):&#xA;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&#34;display:flex;&#34;&gt;&lt;span&gt;    &lt;span style=&#34;color:#c099ff&#34;&gt;if&lt;/span&gt; n &lt;span style=&#34;color:#c3e88d;font-weight:bold&#34;&gt;==&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style=&#34;color:#ffc777&#34;&gt;0&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style=&#34;color:#c3e88d;font-weight:bold&#34;&gt;or&lt;/span&gt; n &lt;span style=&#34;color:#c3e88d;font-weight:bold&#34;&gt;==&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style=&#34;color:#ffc777&#34;&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;:&#xA;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&#34;display:flex;&#34;&gt;&lt;span&gt;        &lt;span style=&#34;color:#c099ff&#34;&gt;return&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style=&#34;color:#ffc777&#34;&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;&#xA;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&#34;display:flex;&#34;&gt;&lt;span&gt;    &lt;span style=&#34;color:#c099ff&#34;&gt;return&lt;/span&gt; fib(n&lt;span style=&#34;color:#c3e88d;font-weight:bold&#34;&gt;-&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&#34;color:#ffc777&#34;&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;) &lt;span style=&#34;color:#c3e88d;font-weight:bold&#34;&gt;+&lt;/span&gt; fib(n&lt;span style=&#34;color:#c3e88d;font-weight:bold&#34;&gt;-&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&#34;color:#ffc777&#34;&gt;2&lt;/span&gt;)&#xA;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&#34;display:flex;&#34;&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span style=&#34;color:#c3e88d&#34;&gt;print&lt;/span&gt;(fib(&lt;span style=&#34;color:#ffc777&#34;&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;))&#xA;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&#34;highlight&#34;&gt;&lt;pre tabindex=&#34;0&#34; style=&#34;color:#c8d3f5;background-color:#222436;-moz-tab-size:4;-o-tab-size:4;tab-size:4;&#34;&gt;&lt;code class=&#34;language-text&#34; data-lang=&#34;text&#34;&gt;&lt;span style=&#34;display:flex;&#34;&gt;&lt;span&gt;8&#xA;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;And while this seems all well and good on the surface, it turns out that this&#xA;is far from an efficient implementation of the sequence. In particular, we end up&#xA;computing calls to &lt;code&gt;fib&lt;/code&gt; that we&amp;rsquo;ve already computed. In other words, we&#xA;perform a lot of redundant computation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
